Why philosophy matters for the study of religion - and vice versa / Thomas A. Lewis
Por: Lewis, Thomas A
.
Tipo de material: ![materialTypeLabel](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
![](/opac-tmpl/bootstrap/images/filefind.png)
![](/opac-tmpl/bootstrap/images/filefind.png)
Tipo de ítem | Ubicación actual | Signatura | Estado | Fecha de vencimiento | Código de barras |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Biblioteca Estudio Teológico Agustiniano de Valladolid Fondo General | 219 L 52 T (Navegar estantería) | Disponible | Va315186 |
Navegando Biblioteca Estudio Teológico Agustiniano de Valladolid Estantes , Ubicación: Fondo General Cerrar el navegador de estanterías
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
No hay imagen de cubierta disponible |
![]() |
No hay imagen de cubierta disponible | ||
216 W43A Suf Suffering Belief | 216 W49 Ber Wer verantwortet das Böse in der Welt ? | 216 Wh 8 B Don ¿ Dónde está Dios ? | 219 L 52 T Why philosophy matters for the study of religion - and vice versa / | 219 l25N Beg The Beginning and the End of "Religion" | 219 S 4 C Inm La inmanencia y lo sagrado : | 22 (03) A4P Diz Il dizionario della Bibbia / |
Incluye referencias bibliográficas (p. 161-171) e índice
Work in philosophy of religion is still strongly marked by an excessive focus on Christianity and, to a lesser extent, Judaism - almost to the exclusion of other religious traditions. Moreover, in many cases it has been confined to a narrow set of intellectual problems, without embedding these in their larger social, historical, and practical contexts. 'Why philosophy matters for the study of religion-and vice versa' addresses this situation through a series of interventions intended to work against the gap that exists between much scholarship in philosophy of religion and important recent developments that speak to religious studies as a whole. This volume takes up what, in recent years, has often been seen as a fundamental reason for excluding religious ethics and philosophy of religion from religious studies: their explicit normativity. Against this presupposition, Thomas A. Lewis argues that normativity is pervasive-not unique to ethics and philosophy of religion-and therefore not a reason to exclude them from religious studies. Lewis bridges more philosophical and historical subfields by arguing for the importance of history to the philosophy of religion
No hay comentarios para este ejemplar.